Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Remember when shitlibs were about sexual freedom? Yeah, that’s over now. “Sexual racism” is the latest preprogrammed NPC line, and Globohomo, Inc has decided it’s time to stamp out the freedom of sexual choice in the name of encouraging more miscegenation.

My body, my choice? Not anymore.

Your racist body, our corrective choice.

You think this hyperbole. Oh no, if only. Mongrelization is now the openly stated goal for White nations and White people.

White people prefer white people on dating apps — but that could be changed, study says

Absolutely chilling.

Dating applications can allow users to fall into their own racial biases while searching for a partner, a new study says.

These “racial biases” in romantic preference are inborn and a structural part of human nature. Dating apps no more “allow” users to “fall into” these racial biases than food allows people to fall into a bias of eating for survival. “Racial bias” is what happens when people have freedom of choice; “racial bias” can only be “stamped out” if freedom of choice is likewise stamped out.

And that’s exactly what Globohomo wants to do! It’s totalitarian, baby! It’s not as if a pesky roadblock like human nature ever stopped totalitarians before from realizing their dystopian visions. </100milliondead>

But in their study, researchers from schools like Cornell University say the “sexual racism” that plagues apps like Grindr, Tinder and Bumble can be stamped out with a few simple changes. The end goal, the study says, is to promote more diverse pairings on the dating sites.

Why does that have to be the end goal? Isn’t real diversity promoted by allowing different races to reproductively sustain themselves through in-race preference, adding to the tapestry of human variety in the world?

Screw it, I should stop using logic on <racemix>NPCs. We all know why this is their end goal: they want to erase Wholesome Whiteness from the world.

Jevan Hutson, lead author of the study, said in a press release from Cornell University that “it’s really an unprecedented time for dating and meeting online” — which requires a more thorough look at how we can prevent discrimination on these dating apps.

I can’t be bothered to check, so I’ll assume at least one of the study authors is [a special person].

FYI, for a laugh, the study is called “Debiasing Desire”. These mad scientists are gonna have to figure out how to rewire White limbic systems without anyone putting up a fuss.

“More people are using these apps, and they’re critical infrastructures that don’t get a lot of attention when it comes to bias and discrimination,” he said in the press release. “Intimacy is very private, and rightly so, but our private lives have impacts on larger socioeconomic patterns that are systemic.”

Translating from the Evil-ese: “We can end inequality by mixing White genes with nonWhite genes, lowering Whites and raising nonWhites until everyone is the same, but diverse. Please clap.”

This has to be a put-on. Please let it be a put-on.

Take the case of Sinakhone Keodara for example. He threatened to sue Grindr, a dating app for gay, bi and trans men, because of “sexual racism” he faced on the site, NBC reported. More specifically, Keodara says some users on the site had captions like “Not interested in Asians.”

NOWAGS getting BTFO on gay dating sites, too.

Phumlani Kango, from Johannesburg, South Africa, said in an interview with NBC that the racism is prevalent in his country, too.

“What happens in Los Angeles … where you have ‘no fats, no femmes,’ it happens [in South Africa] as well,” he told NBC. “… They will say ‘no rice, no chocolate, no curry’ — which means no Asian, no black and no Indian.”

As noted by the study — which compiled data from prior research — white people are ten times more likely to receive a message from a black person on a dating app than they are to message the black user themselves. That suggests a hierarchy of attention on racial lines.

I already wrote about this. More precisely, dating app data analysis reveals White women are the most “racist” (ie they prefer to date in-race more than White men), and black men are more “racist” than black women, going by online dating preferences.

The study found other examples of inequality in dating apps, including:

  • Asian men and black women have the lowest chance of receiving a message or a response.
  • White people of “all ages” prefer to go on dates with other white people.
  • College students are most likely to avoid going on dates with black women.

Yes, reality has a bad habit of contradicting leftoid equalist blank slate delusions.

Stephanie Yeboah, a blogger, said that she has experienced racism as a black woman on online dating apps even when people are open to meeting up, according to The Independent. She said that some people ask offensive questions like if they can “get a taste of jungle fever” — and say they want to see if black women are “as aggressive in bed as they’ve heard.”

LOL I bet liberals write these articles to titillate themselves without risking social ostracism.

“Comments such as these are extremely dehumanizing to myself and other black women who are only looking for companionship,” she told The Independent. “It seems to suggest that black women are only good for one thing,

Ruining the DMV experience?

Even Christian Rudder, founder of OK Cupid, said that “when you’re looking at how two American strangers behave in a romantic context, race is the ultimate confounding factor.”

Race and sex are the alpha and omega of humanness.

But researchers behind the Cornell University study say they have some ways to push back against the racial biases of users.

Are [the special people] just pissed that their outmarriage rate is so high, and they want everyone else to join them in their festival of deracination?

The study’s authors noted that OK Cupid itself experimented with pairing up users and saying they were “highly compatible” — even though they weren’t considered good matches — and found that the conversation between the two people often went well.

Sy ops.

In other words, it appeared that just the mere suggestion that two people were compatible made both users more likely to give the connection a chance. The study’s authors wrote in a press release that it proves “the strong power of suggestion” that can be used to bridge the gap between people of different races.

“A chance” isn’t the same as “a realistic chance”. What do these reeducation camp kommissars think will happen when a White and black meet IRL and discover that they really aren’t as compatible as OKCupid lied to them they were?

Another potential solution could come from 9Monsters, a gay dating app from Japan, that allows people to describe themselves without explicitly revealing their race, according to the study’s authors.

A lot of these race-nullifying experiments are done with gay dating apps for a reason: gay men are less picky about their hookups.

Another gay dating app, called Hornet, prevents people from using their profile to mention race at all.

See?

And a final solution might come in the form of “Kindr,”

“final solution”

 a campaign from Grindr that seeks to stamp out prejudice on its app by promoting inclusion.

NPC mantra alert.

The study’s authors said positive writing about diversity may help promote more diverse couples on the apps.

If Diversity™ needs positive PR, then perhaps it isn’t intrinsically positive.

The new guidelines from Kindr, for example, suggest that users describe “what you’re into, not what you aren’t” to avoid offending others.

“I’m into White women.” Experiment destroyed.

“These guidelines exist to let you express yourself freely while also helping us maintain the safe, authentic, and accepting environment we strive to cultivate,” the guidelines read.

“Kindr is not going to solve racism by any means,” Zumwalt said, according to GQ. “These issues have been present in our community long before Grindr, but we hope to increase conversations around it and have a dialogue about what constitutes sexual racism.”

It must be cohencidental that these “dialogues” always focus on White “racism”, when in fact a sexual preference for one’s own race is evident in nonWhite races as well.

The study’s authors concede that sexual racism is a hard thing to conquer

Like trying to conquer appetite.

Or love.

— but Keodara, who threatened to sue Grindr, said fixing the problem would improve the mental well-being of people of color looking for a chance at love on dating apps, according to The Guardian.

Somewhere, right now, a nonWhite feels bad. White nations must be genetically diluted out of existence to help this person cheer up.

“Over the years I’ve had some pretty harrowing experiences,” Keodara told The Guardian. “You run across these profiles that say ‘no Asians’ or ‘I’m not attracted to Asians’. Seeing that all the time is grating; it affects your self-esteem.”

Here’s a thought: you could move back to your homeland where there are only other asians who won’t affect your racial self-esteem.

You laugh now, “how preposterous!”, but this Orwellian/Bergeronian nightmare is coming for us if we don’t crush these power-tripping globohomos before they can fulfill their dehumanizing, dystopian wish list.

Sexual racism = love doesn’t win, when it’s discriminatory love. It won’t be long before all (White) romantic standards are deemed racist or unfaaaaaaaiiirrrr. I’ll admit I morbidly relish the thought of virtue signaling SWPL White women coming under attack by the shitlib swarm for “discriminating” against short men, poor men, black men, and furries.

No White vagina, no peace!

Love trumps consent!

Bang a minority for equality!

As I wrote, back when I could see this day looming on the horizon,

It’s no more racist to prefer the opposite sex of your own race for dating and fucking than it is to prefer brunettes to blondes. If sex preferences are racist, then we need a new word for *real* racism; racism that includes things like forced segregation (superracism), racial violence (superduperracism) or slavery (goddamnthat’ssomebadassracismrightthere). But our sexual preferences are hardwired, and if the free expression of those preferences are racist, then racism itself is hardwired. Woops. Cat’s out of the bag!

Yes, the cat’s out of the bag, and globohomo has some ideas about how to stuff the cat back in.

The NPC Song: “Feel”

Sung to the tune of AWOLNation’s “Sail”, a brilliant parody of the dogmatic leftoid hivemind (h/t Jay in DC):

Jay:

BTW the lyrics on that ‘cover’ NPC version of AWOLNation are fucking comedy gold, a sample:

♫♫ FEEL!!
I’ve got no inner monologue
I bow before the Syangogue
Maybe I’m an NPC, baby

This is how the ego dies
I’m taking my SSRIs
Maybe I’m an NPC baby.

Feel!
Feel! ♫♫

lzolzolzolzolzolzolozlol dude nailed it

Leftoids really don’t think for themselves, so this meme hits them right in the….feels.

Jay adds that this timeline is unbeatable,

does anyone else find it absurd and ironic and somewhat befitting of clown world that Taylor Swift who was meme’d into Third Reich ubermensch status has come out as a virtue signaling shitlib and her nemesis Kanye fucking West! is /ourguy/

That is some bizarro world type shit, innit?

Abandon Boomer tropes, all Ye who enter here.

PS Paul Watson has a good take on the NPC meme phenomenon:

I know PJW catches flak from some quarters of the Maul-Right, but I think his vids are polished explainers about the shitlib insanities of the day that effectively reach a normie audience.

PPS I wonder if MPC will see a bump in traffic from people mistyping searches for “NPC”?

PMS Anglin has a funny take on the NPC shiv. (It’s been promoted from meme to shiv status, based on the anguished wails coming from butthurt leftoids.)

Here’s another great follow-up NPC post by Anglin, riffing on the JYTimes coverage of the meme.

[The NPC meme] speaks to the core nature of this unhinged leftist mob: that they are not real, that their entire lives are faked, that their emotional state is the result of a marketing campaign.

It trivializes all of them in the most brutal conceivable way.

Spot on.

You have to see this swedish TV ad to believe it, because the cuckery level is so off the charts it would violate Pornhub’s TOS.

I don’t even know wtf I saw here, but I know it was bad. It looked like an ad for interracial surrogacy. A White woman births a mystery meatball, then a sexually indeterminate black xir trots in for a group hug with a HuWhyte man holding the newborn “swede”. (Sneer quotes are the new triple parentheses.)

cortesar adds,

someone in the comment section says/asks
“I do not even know what is sold”
well my swedish friend I will tell what has been sold
Your history, your grand-grand-grandfather your father your children and their yet to be borne children,
that is what is sold

It’s a fire sale! Commenter Roy agrees,

Fritz. Get the flammenwerfer.

From TheGopnik,

Unholy shit !!! Did Barbara Lerner Spectre direct that one herself ?

It’s morbidly funny that the j__iest nation in the world is also one of the most Gentile nations in the world. J__iness through pozmosis?

The problem with sweden (undeserving of capitalization) is that they inherited the biggest load of cuck alleles, AND the government is run and staffed by catladies. This is a recipe for delirious jim jones cult-style mass suicide.

***

Daniel indignantly rebuts,

international marketing is true. This was very likely made by a marketing firm owned by a marketing firm located in New York. We’ve seen this on TV a hundred times. There is no evening without episodes of shows with gays and race mixing. It’s really disingenuous to use it against Sweden when it all comes from Hollywood. And I’m not responsible for Hollywood. Just like ordinary people in Sweden aren’t responsible for this commercial. No one chose this, it was foisted on us.

Have people forgotten who own the media? Does that need to be repeated because some people seem to forget it over and over?

Fair point. Isn’t there a governing body in sweden that can prohibit ads like this one from airing on swedeTV? Anyhow, I’m heartened that there are still some Swedes left with fight in them.

When Cleverness Is A Liability

Steve Sailer noted that Trump’s tweets aren’t very clever, but they don’t need to be, and in fact cleverness might obstruct the lethal precision of Trump’s shivs.

My guess is that Trump will never, ever use “Picohontas.” This has a double utility to Trump. By not using it, Trump doesn’t alienate the vast percentage of voters who don’t know that “pico” means “one-trillionth.” (I personally guessed it meant one-billionth, but that of course would be “Gigahontas.”)

But also, because Trump doesn’t use a supremely clever insult he lures in the Establishment Media to insutlt as a low brow and thus keep the controversiy alive on Trump’s terms; that Senator Warren isn very Indian.

gregor provides additional logic for Trump’s aversion to cleverness when he’s trying to go around the Chaimstream Media and report directly to the people through his Twatter account,

Right. Trump has the right instincts on this. For one thing, these clever portmanteaus work a lot better in writing than in speech. To a writer like Steve the more clever term is irresistible. But a TV guy like Trump knows that you want the spoken phrase to hit immediately. You don’t your audience confused even for a second about why you’re mispronouncing Pocahontas.

The other part of it is that Trump isn’t a nerd.

Cleverness comes across better in writing, that’s true. And better in movies, which are scripted and edited to ensure clever lines aren’t lost like they are in the normal raucousness of real life casual conversation, or drowned out by background interruption.

I like cleverness, and I indulge it, but I tend to steer clear of it offline, unless I know my audience will appreciate it. I particularly avoid it when seducing girls, unless the girl is a type I’ve learned from experience will cherish my whimsical quips (artsy, smart, dressed in odd yet feminine clothing (pixie chic)).

I’ve similarly noted that cleverness can be an obstacle to a proper seduction. If you’re too clever, you’re liable to be perceived as too try-hard, which is the kiss of death for a pickup. Plus, you run a high risk of flubbing your delivery, or straining to locate the verbiage, or messing up the timing (because an AMOG rudely interrupted your moment in the sun with a shoulder punch), any of which will repulse the girl because now she thinks you desperately want to make an impression on her (but are failing at it)……which only reinforces the “male chaser-female chasee” script, that you should be flipping if you want to negate the natural advantage girls have in the early stages of courtship.

You don’t need to be witty to have Game:

…if you are all wit and no frame, you are an entertainment monkey who arouses women’s brains but leaves their pussies dry. In contrast, if you are all frame and no wit, you are a sexy beast women can’t help but find alluring, even as they gripe about your curt assholery to their friends.

Now, it should go without saying (though this blog does attract its share of stupids and ego-invested contrarians who need it said over and over) that it’s better to have frame AND wit, rather than frame alone. Hank Moody wit is a killer weapon to have in the field, even more potent than having top 10% looks. But, if you had to choose, frame is the better of the two. So banish from your thoughts doubts that your lack of wit consigns you to involuntary celibacy. I’ve witnessed too many overconfident lunkheads without a clever word to say but teeming with the right attitude effortlessly swoop babes to believe otherwise.

Maxim #55: Less talking is always sexier than more talking. If you struggle to find something witty to say to a girl, stop trying. Flailing for the “right” words is approval-seeking beta behavior that women can sniff from across a room.

Corollary to Maxim #55: A grunt or aloof gesture trumps a try-hard, strained, verbose comeback.

When this subject comes up in real life, I like to tell my guy friends to recall those times they were challenged or annoyed by their sisters or some female friends they didn’t find attractive. I ask them to remember how they felt, how they acted, and what they said. Invariably, they all say they remember being cool as cucumbers, dismissive, and even rude. They were careless with their words and cared even less what their sisters or unattractive female friends thought of them. They remember feeling like one might feel if a mosquito was buzzing around one’s head; they just wanted to shoo it away, or tell it to go find the nearest bug zapper. They certainly did not try to impress them with Shakespearean wit.

“Good,” I say. “Now that’s the way you should act when you talk to ATTRACTIVE girls.”

Frame before wit. Get the basics right first and the mentally scripted fluff will sound more authentic later.

Indirect vs Direct vs Clever Openers:

Eric Barker, the guy who runs that fantastic repository of helpful science, notes that mentally tired people are less receptive to clever pickup lines. If you’re churning through garbage hour and hitting on tired girls, keep it simple. A brief comment about something in your shared environment is all it will take.

So cute (aka douchebag) lines are the worst. No surprise there. Those kinds of lines are spit more for the entertainment of a guy’s buddies watching nearby than they are for the purpose of attracting a girl.

Clever lines you aspiring William F. Buckleys might be tempted to use are wasted on tired girls, and likely on any girl with an IQ under 120, which is most of them.

Direct openers aren’t as bad as cutesy openers, but girls still prefer the indirect strategy from men.

The abiding truth that game practitioners keep coming back to (and that science often confirms) is that girls don’t want the nuts and bolts of their seduction revealed to them; they want men to just *know* what they like and give them the *feelings* of being successfully seduced, and that means men must maintain plausible deniability about their sexual intentions, even if feminists shriek that such a mating strategy amounts to “manipulation”.

Again, cleverness has limited applicability in the realm of pickup. Use it sparingly, and targeted to girls who will admire it.

If you are a clever man, you won’t want to surrender an SMV advantage. Would a tall man willingly give up a foot of height? I understand that men will want to use every tool at their disposal to outcompete other men and fat cockblocks for the poosy prize, but cleverness is a double-edged sword that can swing against you if it’s unsheathed too frequently. The best compromise is to pair your cleverness with aloof body language and attitude, so that you seem less like you’re impressing the girl than you are amusing yourself.

Instead of cleverness, think more in terms of “power words“:

The ideal verbal approach is to coax an accelerated camaraderie with the use of “power words” — which are usually mono- or bisyllabic — that girls promptly jack into via emotional pathways that electrify fastest when lubed by simpler, stronger words than by nuanced Oxfordian words stuffed with exquisite connotations. This will be your conversational base, over which you will furnish the occasional five-dollar words and ambiguous subtext, because no pickup attempt went to the bedroom without first rubbing her rationalization hamster against the grain.

We’ve all known that ladykiller Chad who struts into conversations and drops 10 cent monosyllabic words like nukes, drawing female attention to himself, blowing up male competition, and, like Trump, opening a fruitful path for further flirtation (or media amplification).

Cleverness should be a supplement, not your main lingual course. Picohontas? The mensa crowd claps. Pocohontas? The lady vaj flaps. Find that balance and pickup will become a joy instead of a chore.

The latest revelation of Deep State perfidy evident in the connection between a Pakistani immigrant limo driver who killed twenty White Americans in New York and Christine Blasey-Ford’s longtime FBI friend Monica McLean would have shocked me a mere few years ago.

Today? I shrug. Business as usual. Totally expected.

Mystery as Christine Ford’s FBI Lawyer Pal Is Linked to Owner of Limo Company That Killed 20 People in NY

Monica McLean, the best pal of Kavanaugh-accuser Christine Ford, is linked to the case of the limo company owner tied to the recent deaths of 20 people in New York.

McLean’s name turned up in a FBI filing where the owner Shahed Hussain [ed: does not pass the “American-sounding name” citizenship test] was an FBI RAT in a case to help the bureau charge Muslims in “a plot to detonate explosives near a synagogue in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, New York, and to shoot military planes located at the New York Air National Guard Base at Stewart Airport in Newburgh, New York, with Stinger surface-to-air guided missiles,” according to public records.

Hussain was also an FBI RAT in New York criminal cases.

The limo company owner is reportedly also on the lam for a murder in Pakistan, but why should that stop the FBI from paying him as an informant? […]

McLean is listed on one of the DOJ’s case files where terrorists Hussain ratted out were pinched.

I guess the knowledge the FBI was harboring and paying an accused murderer who was on the run sort of shatters her credibility as a fact witness against Kavanaugh.

Here is the filing from the DOJ as warehoused and compiled by the Investigative Reporting Project.

The same players keep resurfacing in bad things as does the FBI. And the Southern District of New York, a breeding ground for domestic problems and skulduggery stemming from its federal law enforcement apparatus’.

Monica McLean is the missing piece in a lot of these Creep State puzzles, and it’s a wonder (it’s not) the Chaimstream Media doesn’t investigate her or peer into her motives. This Paki limo driver connection is probably a weird coincidence, but it speaks to McLean’s character (not good) and suggests she’d be the type of power-tripping catlady who’d gleefully write a phony false sexual assault letter for her catfriend Ballcutter-Fraud, and pass it off under oath before Congress, knowing well that her FBI and media NeverTrump buddies at the head of the silent coup to oust Trump would cover for her.

PS Isn’t it funny how quickly the media and their lackeys dropped any further investigations into Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh once their fates were determined? It’s a moral crisis to the media-Dems until the accused are no longer useful to the Cause.

PPS Sweden’s anti-White virtue signaling is hitting a fever pitch. The Swedish Catlady government is preparing to expel a 6-year-old orphan to Ukraine while granting amnesty to 9,000 Afghans. Pure malice motivates Swedish cucks.

PPPS maybe you missed it, because the media wouldn’t cover it, but the Russia Hoax imploded today:

Mark your calendars, today is the day everything changed. SHITLIBS BTFO

PPPPAmazonPrime Not Deep State related, but may as well be:

Who Horseface This Is?

Stormy Daniels will go down in history as a garbage human.

Trump will go down in history as a transformational president of the United States.

And that’s today’s lesson in “who bitch this is?“.

***

Stormy Daniels will go down.

That’s about the best you can say about her. While she’s down there, strap a feedbag on her and say “hi ho, Stormy!”.

***

Background: A judge ruled that Daniels-Avenatti’s defamation lawsuit against President Trump was frivolous, and ordered her to pay Trump’s legal fees. Trump got a refund from a whore. #winning

Then Trump twatted this,

“Federal Judge throws out Stormy Danials lawsuit versus Trump. Trump is entitled to full legal fees.” @FoxNews Great, now I can go after Horseface and her 3rd rate lawyer in the Great State of Texas. She will confirm the letter she signed! She knows nothing about me, a total con!
8:04 am – 16 Oct 2018

She really is a Horseface. (Double plus goodness that Trump capitalized “Horseface”)

Post title courtesy of Trevor Goodchild. (I laughed)

Fauxcahontas is back in the news. She secretly hired a university geneticist (aka a Democrat) to sample her DNA (which was done privately in case the result wasn’t what she wanted). She wished to confirm for the world and for Goad Emperor Trump that she was, indeed, American Indian and thus eligible for affirmative action bennies. Trump had successfully goaded Warren into desperately seeking external validation.

Aaaaaaaaand, the envelope please….

99.8% White European!

0.2% Wigwam (best estimation)

Except even that 0.2% is misleading, as it turns out the analysis didn’t test for Native American DNA (it used samples from Peru, Mexico, and Colombia, a very loose genetic proxy for, say, the Cherokee that Elizabeth Warren has claimed for herself).

(A wag over at Sailer’s teepee calls her “Picohontas”.)

Warren has been lying about her heritage since she could move her lips, and this “revelation” is no different. The very readable Sean Davis amply documents Warren’s lies, in a series of twats:

Every Time Elizabeth Warren Has Lied About Her Native American Heritage:

(Thread)

1. Elizabeth Warren self-identified as a “Native American” in the The Association of American Law Schools Directory of law professors in every edition printed between 1986 -1995.

2. After becoming a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, Warren demanded the University change her faculty listed ethnicity from “white” to “Native American.”

3. Warren was identified by Harvard Law as a “woman of color.” Harvard promoted Warren’s hire as expanding their campus diversity by hiring a woman with “minority background” onto their faculty.

4. Here is video of Warren telling this story: “My mom and dad were very much in love and they wanted to get married. My father’s parents said ‘Absolutely not because she’s part Cherokee and Delaware.’ After fighting it they eloped.”

5. Warren submitted multiple recipes for the Indian cookbook “Pow Wow Chow” and signed her name, “Elizabeth Warren – Cherokee”

LMAO thank you Trump for pushing your enemies into making one own-goal after another!

6. Warren used offensive, racially charged language to defend her claims of Native American heritage, declaring that her family had “high cheekbones” like “all the Indians do.”

Here is video of that moment. [ed: missing numbers 7 and 8 in the series of tweets]

9. Warren’s DNA report did not measure actual Native American DNA. The report actually measured Colombian, Mexican and Peruvian DNA. Of which Warren *may* have a tiny, tiny fraction – possibly.

FYI the Cherokees don’t recognize Warren’s claims to American Indian heritage either.

Bonus lulz, Warren has less Indian DNA than the average White American. There’s a chance Trump has more Indian DNA than Warren!

Naturally, Trump is dog-piling on Picohontas in his Twatter feed (too funny that these Trump tweets will be archived for posterity).

Pocahontas (the bad version), sometimes referred to as Elizabeth Warren, is getting slammed. She took a bogus DNA test and it showed that she may be 1/1024, far less than the average American. Now Cherokee Nation denies her, “DNA test is useless.” Even they don’t want her. Phony!

Thank you to the Cherokee Nation for revealing that Elizabeth Warren, sometimes referred to as Pocahontas, is a complete and total Fraud!

She owes the country an apology. What is the percentage? 1/1000th?

TRUMP says he will only pay 1 million dollars to charity for Warren if he can test her personally: “I will only do it if I can test her personally. That will not be something that I enjoy doing”

Everyone’s getting in on the mockery! It’s a party! Or should I say, powwow.

Trump should drop a nuke on shitlib egos and tweet “All these libs defending Fauxcahontas, sudden believers in DNA evidence. But I thought they said race was a social construct? BWA HAHAHA.”

Reality: White shitlibs are the BIGGEST SECRET BELIEVERS in the relevance of race and racial identifiers like DNA and genealogy. This is why they push idiotic ideas like “race is a social contruct”; they’re trying to run away from their own illicit thoughts, and they want to confuse their mortal enemies, the RealtalkWhites.

Warren is a liar who used her false claim of Indian blood (greater than what the average White American possesses) to get into Ivy League schools and boost her career prospects as a “nonWhite minority”. She exploited a shitty system for her own shitty selfish reasons.

What I love most about this fauxcahontas real time satire is how it utterly undermines the whole corrupt affirmative action system and anti-racism agitprop in one fell swoop. “So, wait, race IS real and I can game the system by claiming 0.2% nonwhite blood?” This rotten house of cards is close to falling down. If Warren can claim oppressed minority status with 0.2% redman DNA, then everyone can leverage the background noise in DNA tests to angle for freebies from academia and the government. In fact, everyone should do this, because it will cause the scheme to collapse from too many claimants on limited reserves.

PS One more visual shiv:

%d bloggers like this: